sign up for our

Home Shop Subscribe Advertise Articles Directories Classifieds Calendar FAQs Contact Us Login

Don't Commit 'Career Suicide' In AI:
How To Keep Control Of Your Cloned Voice
January 11, 2022

By Robert J. Sciglimpaglia
Attorney, Voice Actor, Actor, Producer, Author

I have had the privilege of being involved with the evolution of text-to-speech (TTS) technology - also known as artificial intelligence (AI). This technology produces what is known in the business as a computer-generated synthetic or cloned voice.  

Back in 2016 I was fortunate enough to have been hired by CKP Media in New York City to negotiate the contract and direct the sessions for the BIXBY voice, which is used on the Samsung phones and appliances. That was in the early developmental days of voice over, when text-to-speech consisted of computers piecing sounds and sentences together. 

At that time, companies were hiring voice talent to be the "voice" of their brand. 

For instance, in my case, Samsung had done an extensive worldwide search through auditions, much like a commercial audition, and the final voice was chosen after "test marketing" through focus groups. That empowered talent to be able to demand a very nice wage for their services.

Also during that period of time, the big tech companies Amazon, Google, Apple and Microsoft were developing text-to-speech voice banks. At the beginning, these companies hired people off the street to come into a studio for a $50 gift card to say a bunch of random phrases, and that is how they captured the voices for the early text to speech "voices." 


Those companies quickly realized however, the concept of "garbage in, garbage out," since the untrained off-the-street voices were not of good enough quality to allow the computers to produce quality synthetic voices.

So the companies started contracting out to third-party companies to hire professional voice talent to record several thousand lines of copy at $2,000 to $5,000 per job. The voice talent would sign over their rights to ownership of the sound files, and agree that the files could be sold and transferred to third parties to use for any purpose, for as long as they company wanted ("in perpetuity"), without any recourse by talent. 

The sole purpose of the third-party companies is to either set up banks of artificial, cloned voices, or to sell the files to companies that use artificial cloned voices. 

So basically what talent were agreeing to was to create a clone of their voice, to be used anywhere for any purpose.

This is what I label as "career suicide" because the voice talent will actually be competing against themselves.


Now there is a newer, better wave of companies that have pledged to use artificial intelligence ethically and in conjunction with the voice over profession. 

These companies create a clone of the talent's voice that will belong to the talent.

The talent will be able to market their clone voice for any purpose, including commercially, and will receive a future residual for any sales generated by use of their cloned voice. 


I often hear the argument that AI is not an issue and that it will not replace human voices because "it sounds like a robot" - lacking the emotion and inflection of the human voice. 

The problem with this argument is that the AI technology is advancing so quickly that the ability to tell "live" from "clone" is becoming very difficult. Very soon, one won't be able to tell the difference. 

In addition, technology now exists where recording of separate lines of text is no longer necessary to create a clone. Existing recordings that are long enough can be used to create the voice.

For instance, Val Kilmer, who is suffering from throat cancer and cannot speak, was able to have his voice cloned using voices from his films - and now his cloned voice speaks for him. 

This technology also allows film companies to do ADR (automated dialogue replacement) without having to call the actors back in, by using the existing dialogue track from the film.  


All of this means that talent need to be able to recognize the language in auditions and contracts to be able to tell the "good" AI jobs vs. the "bad" potentially career-injuring ones. 

Contracts to avoid are the ones that ask for full ownership of the voice files, to be used:
  • for any purpose,
  • in any media, in perpetuity, and
  • that can be transferred or sold to third parties.
By contrast, look for contracts that allow you to own your cloned voice. They:
  • limit the time or usage,
  • pay future residuals to the talent when their "cloned" voice is used commercially, and
  • give the talent the right to negotiate with any third parties that the files are transferred to.
These contracts can bolster a talent's career by creating a "clone" partner. One that will potentially live on and continue to earn income for future generations to come. 

Not a bad legacy, I would say.

NOTE: The author recently represented voice actor Bev Standing in a successful lawsuit that charged social media giant TikTok with unauthorized use of Standing's recorded voice. Details here.
Practicing law since 1991, Robert J. Sciglimpaglia Jr. is an attorney admitted to the bars of Connecticut and New York, specializing in several fields including entertainment law where he represents actors, voice over artists, musical acts and bands on issues including representation agreements, contracts and copyrights. He is also a professional voice actor, actor in on-camera commercials and TV programs and film, film producer voice over coach and radio program host. He is also author of Voice Over LEGAL, the essential guide to managing voice over business and legal issues - and number one on the Amazon Best Seller list for Entertainment Law books, published by VoiceOverXtra.

Voice Over Legal:

Your Daily Resource For Voice-Over Success
Tell Us What YOU Think!
Please Note: Since we check for spam, there will be a slight delay in the actual posting of your comment.
Your Name:
Your Email Address (will not be published):
Your Comment:
Your Comment:
Security code:     
Comments (3)
Charles Bain
3/21/2023 at 2:37 PM
How is the site still online? It’s clear that they’ve voice harvested as they have Tom Kenney and Christian Bale among the hundred of other famous voices. Why have they not had their pants sued off?

Is there a reporting tool, possibly with NAVA, that we can submit sites like this?
Robert Sciglimpaglia
1/11/2022 at 11:10 AM
If there is no contract and recording was done on your equipment you own the recording and can sue under Copyright law or “moral rights” laws for potential illegal use of voice and/or likeness. This is what Bev Standings case was all about.
James Conlan
1/11/2022 at 9:44 AM
All good, timely information. Thanks. But what about situations of outright theft? No contract, no agreement of any kind. This is where the real problem will lie in the future.
Back to Articles
Get your bi-weekly dose here ... all things VO!
For essential voice-over business strategies
Email alerts to new VoiceOverXtra articles
With Sean Daeley and Paul Stefano - check it out!