sign up for our

Home Shop Subscribe Advertise Articles Directories Classifieds Calendar FAQs Contact Us Login

2016 Is History - Yet The Year Ends With
'New Normals' For Voice Over Income
December 30, 2016

By Paul Strikwerda
Voice Actor

For many reasons, 2016 was a year for the history books.

Where shall I begin? Let’s start with the economy, stupid! The on-demand gig economy, to be exact.

If as a self-employed person you ever feel isolated, remember this: You are not alone!


The freelance workforce in the U.S. grew from 53.7 to 55 million people this year, now representing 35% of workers.

In 2020, this number is expected to go up to a whopping 50%. In other words: you are part of the new normal.

That’s a good thing, and a bad thing. 

Right now, freelancers contribute an estimated $1 trillion annually in freelance earnings to the U.S. economy. Unfortunately, flex workers don’t enjoy the same benefits and protections as non-freelancers.

Employers have turned regular, full-time jobs, into part-time, freelance jobs. That way, they don’t have to contribute to health care, pension plans, and other benefits.

Because the freelance workforce is mostly unorganized and unprotected, it’s easy for employers to do whatever they want.

According to the Freelancers Union, over 70% of their members have been cheated out of payments that they’ve earned, and are stiffed an average of $6,390 every year.


But on that topic there is some good news that made 2016 a historic year. It’s something that has been mostly overlooked in voice over circles, perhaps because it’s relevant to the 1.3 million freelancers in New York City.

However, this news could eventually be the beginning of change in the rest of the country. 

In October, the NYC Council unanimously passed a bill helping freelancers get paid on time and in full. On November 16th, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed it into law, and it’s called the Freelance Isn’t Free Act.

NYC is the first city in the nation to provide protections against non-payment for freelancers and independent contractors. 

Here’s how it works:
  • The law, which will apply to contracts of $800 and up, requires any company that hires a freelance worker to execute a simple written contract (it could be as simple as an email), describing the work to be completed, the rate and method of payment, the date when payment is due, and basic contact information for both parties.  
  • Payment in full is required within 30 days of the completion of services or of the payment due date under the contract, whichever is later.
  • Companies that fail to pay would face penalties, including double damages, attorney’s fees, and civil penalties.
  • Under the law, companies would be prohibited from retaliation against freelancers who seek to exercise their rights under this bill.

According to council member Brad Lander who worked closely with the Freelancers Union to write the NYC bill:
"The NYC Department of Consumer Affairs will act as a navigator for freelancers facing nonpayment. DCA will provide model written contracts in multiple languages, accept complaints from freelancers, issue a "Notice of Complaint” to hiring parties that don’t pay, and make it easier for an aggrieved freelancer to bring charges to court”
He continues:
"Just 5% of freelancers take delinquent clients to court, in large part due to the very high cost of hiring an attorney, and the unlikelihood for that lawyer to take the case 'on spec.' Those freelancers that do bring deadbeat clients to court are often subject to retaliation - an especially big problem for freelancers that work through agencies, or on an ongoing retainer.
"By passing this law, NYC is helping to address a big gap in state and federal laws for protecting workers. The Freelance Isn’t Free Act can serve as a model for cities across the country to take action to protect the growing number of 'gig economy' workers.”
And that’s precisely what I hope will happen. This law needs to become the norm in our nation so freelancers like you and me are protected from non-paying clients.


The last thing that made 2016 a historic year is this: unionized voice actors appearing in video games went on strike against 11 employers.

The sticking points are twofold: working conditions and the compensation method.

I could easily devote an entire article to dig deeper into the issues, but instead I encourage you to click on this link to get a better idea of what’s going on.


This is the first time I feel SAG-AFTRA is taking voice actors seriously.

For years, the unions have treated us as second and third-rate citizens. Now that certain video games make even more money than some Hollywood blockbusters, we finally matter.

However, video game voice actors make up a small percentage of all unionized voice talent, and I want SAG-AFTRA to care just as much about the compensation and working conditions of other members.

Whatever the outcome of the strike may be, the agreement reached will send a signal to the entire industry, and will impact both union and non-union talent.

Why is that? Well, technology is changing rapidly. More people watch content online, and the Internet knows no borders. Traditional media markets that were used to determine rates are rapidly disappearing, and our pay needs to be up to par with this changing landscape.


The strike is also testing our solidarity as a professional group. Will newcomers take advantage of the situation, and cross the (virtual) picket line?

You may find it shocking that some colleagues will act as scabs, but to me this is an indicator of another trend: the deliberate weakening of the position of voice overs from within.

Every day a symbolic picket line is crossed by voice overs that are taking jobs for less because…
  • "Some money is better than no money”
  • "I’m just getting my feet wet”
  • "It’s only a hobby.”
  • "The client said she couldn’t afford to pay more.”
  • "I’m an idiot and I only care about myself.”

I hope 2017 will be the year in which union and non-union voice actors will take a stand, just like their video game voicing colleagues.

I’m not suggesting we go on strike, but we can refuse to work for clients that don’t take our craft seriously.

In fact, we don’t take our craft seriously every time we allow a client to take advantage of us, financially or otherwise. There are 55 million independent workers in the U.S., and our numbers are rapidly growing.

But if we don’t act now to protect our livelihood, voice overs won’t be part of the increase. And we only have ourselves to blame.
Paul Strikwerda is a 25-year veteran of the voice over industry whose Nethervoice service features German and Dutch voice overs, translation and evaluation services. Born in Holland, he has worked for Dutch national and international radio, the BBC and American Public Radio. Although 90% of his work is in English, Strikwerda also records in Dutch, German and French. Clients include Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and the Discovery Channel. And he is author of the new book, Making MONEY In Your PJs: Freelancing for voice-overs and other solopreneurs, and publishes an informative and entertaining blog, Double Dutch.

Double Dutch Blog:

Making MONEY In Your PJs:

Your Daily Resource For Voice-Over Success
Tell Us What YOU Think!
Please Note: Since we check for spam, there will be a slight delay in the actual posting of your comment.
Your Name:
Your Email Address (will not be published):
Your Comment:
Your Comment:
Security code:     
Comments (3)
Paul Strikwerda
1/4/2017 at 3:43 PM
Hi Jay, I don't come from the "every man/woman for him/herself" school. Employers are already playing a divide and conquer game, and that's not a game each of us individually can win. The situation in New York City proves the point. Without this new law, clients would continue to take advantage of the weak position of the many freelancers in the Big Apple. Most freelancers don't have the means, time, or energy to take non-paying clients to court, and they shouldn't have to. Just because they're freelancers, they shouldn't have to work for FREE.

I don't think that bigger jobs will be split up into smaller jobs to evade the law. Many freelancers are involved in long-term projects worth thousands of dollars. If a client tries to break that up into smaller units, that should be a huge red flag.

Lastly, I don't believe for one second that the many freelancers who have been stiffed for thousands of dollars are -as you say- "whining." They have provided services they were asked to do, and they deserve to be paid, precisely because they're trying to run their business as a business.

I'm not in favor of overregulation, but had the free enterprise model worked in this market, there wouldn't have been any need for the Freelance Isn't Free Act.
Memo Sauceda
1/2/2017 at 9:40 AM
Excellent article Paul!

I hope this is the begging of a new era for freelancers.

I only have one comment: Having been a part of the local board in Miami of Aftra and now Sag-Aftra, I can attest that they have always regarded VO talent as a very important part of the Union.

Here's to a great 2017!
12/30/2016 at 8:51 PM
Wow! Where to start and how to keep it short.'re a good guy and great professional. But I'm concerned we "VO Vets" are not seeing the forest for the trees.

First...face it: Unions are going the way of the dinosaur. Every year fewer and fewer workers accept the concept that "someone has to look out for us; there's safety in numbers". Where is that old entrepreneurial spirit represented in that very word: FREELANCER.

Second, TECHNOLOGY is changing everything; giving more opportunities for voiceover work. Thanks to this new law all NY jobs will be $799 or lower. Or split into two jobs. Or 20 jobs so the law won't apply. Therefore the 30-day payment element is moot. Ditto the retaliation rules. Meanwhile, negating all of it keeps the lawyers out of it. It's a "symbolic" law at best.

How about the concept that every freelancer take charge of his own business...get work, demand a "down payment" (healthy enough that if they don't pay, you can live with it); require the balance due upon job completion (no carrying a client for 30-days!).

It's your business; YOU set the rules!

When will the "workers" of America stop cowering and just run their business as business normally runs?
Why do we need the "intermediaries/overseers/controllers/bargainers" in the middle? Why do we need MORE laws to do business? Just do it and stop whining!

And, long live FREE ENTERPRISE! OK...let the bullets fly! =)
Back to Articles
Email alerts to new VoiceOverXtra articles
With Sean Daeley and Paul Stefano - check it out!
Get your bi-weekly dose here ... all things VO!
Inspiring interviews help your VO career