sign up for our

Home Shop Subscribe Advertise Articles Directories Classifieds Calendar FAQs Contact Us Login

Do We Shoot The Messenger, Or
Is The Voice Over Role 'Just Politics'?

By Paul Strikwerda
Voice Actor & Author

A painful, and often embarrassing war of words is finally over. America has voted. The people have spoken.  We have a president-elect, and his name is Donald J. Trump

Some of us are elated. Some of us are scared.  Some of us are asking ourselves: "How the heck did this happen?”

Now, before you think this is yet another analysis of the election, let me stop you.

This is primarily a thought about people’s voices and their meaning - and that’s why you and I need to talk. 


How so? Because some of us were foot soldiers in this war of words. Soldiers of fortune. 

I’m referring to the voice actors who used their talent to spread the message of a particular party. Masterful manipulators, hand-picked and hired to move hearts and minds. 

That’s not some dark, political point of view. It’s the ultimate purpose of our profession. Clients hire voice actors when they have something to sell, someone to entertain, something to teach, or something to preach. 

If we do our jobs well, we lift dead words off the page, and bring them to life in the most impactful way possible.

Sometimes that way is a seductive whisper. Sometimes it is a battle cry about making a nation great again, or stronger together.


As long as that cry is believable, people are buying it in droves. It’s all about influence.

A masterful audiobook narrator can create wonderful worlds and characters that become an intimate part of the listener’s experience.

Well-delivered catch phrases from commercials become ingrained in our culture. 

As the French say: "It’s the tone that makes the music,” and in my mind, it’s the voice over who sets the tone, whether it’s someone like Sir David Attenborough, Gilbert Godfrey or Morgan Freeman.   

Who can forget the way Ed McMahon delivered his "Here’s Johnny,” for almost 30 years? Who doesn’t remember Don LaFontaine’s booming "In a world…”  or Don Pardo announcing Saturday Night Live

As you’re reading these words, you probably heard their voices inside your head, and hearing these voices put you in a certain state of mind, if only for a moment. 

Don’t worry. That’s perfectly normal. Voice actors infuse scripts with meaning and emotion. A talented voice actor can "play” the words, the way a musician turns notes into music, and music into art. 


Now, at this point I can hear some of you say:  "Slow down a little. What’s the big deal? Words are just words! You can’t get wet from the word water. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.”

Well, you’re wrong. Words are powerful weapons. Depending on who delivers them, and how they are delivered, words can act as a placebo, or as a poison.  

The word Kristallnacht isn’t "just” a word. Kristallnacht opens up a burning world of meaning; a world of anti-Semitism and intolerance that led to the killing of six million innocent people. 

Words are loaded. They can be used to divide, to incite, to help, and to heal. Words drive teenagers to suicide, and words inspire religious fanatics to murder and maim. Words are never "just” words. 


Now, subscribing to the idea that words have power has implications for all of us, and especially for professional communicators.

Whether you’re a copywriter, a speech writer, a politician, or a voice actor, as a paid manipulator of language, you have the responsibility to ask yourself:
  • "To what aim am I doing my job?”
  • "What are the potential consequences?” 
  • "Would this project I’m involved in make me proud?”
  • "Under what circumstances would I refuse to work on something?”
  • "Is this job an opportunity to make money, to make a difference, or both?” 
Some of my fellow voice actors answer those questions in a very pragmatic way. They tell me: "Don’t shoot the messenger. I’m only an actor. I’ll say whatever they pay me to say.” 


To be perfectly honest with you: I struggle with that attitude. Especially when it’s about causes I strongly believe in, I find it hard to separate personal from professional ethics.

For instance, as a lifelong vegetarian, I would never butcher my beliefs to promote the consumption of meat, no matter how much they’d pay me.

At the same time, I’m not going to make the mistake of confusing an actor with his or her character. If someone portrays a member of the KKK in a movie, I know it doesn’t mean he supports the KKK. Perhaps that actor wanted to play this role to warn the world about the dangers of the Klan. 


So, to help myself deal with some professional, moral dilemmas, I find it useful to make a distinction between fiction, and fantasy.

As a voice actor I give myself permission to play a despicable person if it’s non-fiction (and with certain limitations). But I would never record a promo video for the KKK. 

And what about political ads? Would I be willing to help a political party influence the voters? It depends. Although many political ads sound too good to be true, I put them in the category of non-fiction. They’re a tool in a battle to influence the masses. They’re instruments of propaganda.

Based on my personal morals, and knowing what I know about the power of words, I would never lend my voice to a message I don’t believe in, regardless of the paycheck. My voice is for hire, but my integrity is not for sale.


I understand that you may draw the line differently, because your values and beliefs are different from mine. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t discuss ethics in our profession.

Our voice is a powerful instrument of influence, that can be used for many purposes, good, or bad. 

One last thing. Let’s not confuse doing a great job with doing what is right. It is very much possible to do great work for a terrible cause.

Leni Riefenstahl’
Triumph des Willens is a cinematic masterpiece of propaganda about the 1934 Nazi Party Congress in Nuremberg. Her documentary Olympia about the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, was groundbreaking. Sometimes it’s not the work itself that’s being criticized. It’s the purpose it serves, that matters.

With that being said, it’s time to adjust to a new reality. 

Our election is over. To many observers, this wasn’t an election about issues. This was an election about emotions; about who was best at selling a message to the masses. A painful, and often embarrassing war of words has finally come to an end.

Or is it just beginning?
Paul Strikwerda is a 25-year veteran of the voice over industry whose Nethervoice service features German and Dutch voice overs, translation and evaluation services. Born in Holland, he has worked for Dutch national and international radio, the BBC and American Public Radio. Although 90% of his work is in English, Strikwerda also records in Dutch, German and French. Clients include Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and the Discovery Channel. And he is author of the new book, Making MONEY In Your PJs: Freelancing for voice-overs and other solopreneurs, and writes an informative and entertaining blog.


Making MONEY In Your PJs:

Your Daily Resource For Voice-Over Success
Tell Us What YOU Think!
Please Note: Since we check for spam, there will be a slight delay in the actual posting of your comment.
Your Name:
Your Email Address (will not be published):
Your Comment:
Your Comment:
Security code:     
Comments (5)
Paul Strikwerda
11/15/2016 at 3:43 PM
Thanks for all the comments and "likes." For those of you who don't know: I was born and raised in the Netherlands, and I moved to the USA at the end of 1999. My favorite Dutch city in Holland is Utrecht.
Pat O'Neill
11/12/2016 at 1:41 PM
Excellently said, Paul. Some in-laws of mine, who hate Hillary Clinton, rationalized voting for Trump by saying all the offensive things he's said are "just words."
Paul Rousse
11/11/2016 at 3:47 PM
Paul...very thoughtful and well written.
Peter J. Marx
11/11/2016 at 3:00 PM
Well expressed, Paul. You can argue it either way. Myself, I will not accept auditions for entities which conduct their businesses in a manner which I consider fundamentally ethically unacceptable, e.g., predatory businesses and those which abuse their employees such as Walmart. I don't expect everyone to agree with my views, but I don't want to be part of the promotion of a business which to me at least is fundamentally unethical.

(I note you are from Holland. I've lived in Europe, am fluent in French, and have a cousin who lives on the Prinsengracht in Amsterdam. Great town, by the way.)
11/11/2016 at 12:54 PM
Well said, Paul! As a theatre and voiceover artist I have struggled with that dilemma many a time...still do. Money or Morals....hard to serve two masters when they are at opposing views. Your articles are always full of valuable insight. Thank you for sharing them!
Back to Articles
For essential voice-over business strategies
With Sean Daeley and Paul Stefano - check it out!
Email alerts to new VoiceOverXtra articles
Inspiring interviews help your VO career